@Grahame Grieve yesterday while FMG was reviewing the publication request for FAST Security. This is a ballot to expand from us to UV realm. Question comes up in that the package id has us in it today. Wht should be done? Those on the call deferred to you.

it get's changed. this happened in the past with SDC

Just as a process note, that project also needs to be updated with information detailing the international participation for the project before it can move to ballot. The prospective investigations that are in the PSS now were of the 'people considering getting involved' rather than 'people that are involved'. (this was all discussed at the time, but does not appear to have been updated and I do not want you to run into roadblocks later =).

@David Pyke

@Grahame Grieve do I change the id in the source? Or is this something you will do during publicaiton?

you have to do it in the source

I will have to figure the consequences out during publication

so the new id doesn't even need to be related to the old one? Today the id is very historic and includes udap -- hl7.fhir.us.udap-security -- would likely be better to be hl7.fhir.uv.fast-security, with a new path similarly this way. Maybe the team does not want to change this. I will check with them. I ask here as I want to understand how open to change we can be.

if we can put it as fast-security, that would be best

that update has happened.

@David Pyke see Gino's comment

@Gino Canessa we do have internationally relevant vendors like Epic. Do those count?

I am not exactly authoritative for this :-). Generally, the view has been where it is being applied. E.g., a company outside the US would not count if they are only targeting the US market for it; a company in the US would count if they are targeting a different market. Overall , the rule is to ensure that there is design/feedback from more than a single jurisdiction. TSC is the authority on whether something is meeting the bar. Personally, I prefer to have concrete info in those cases (e.g., vendor "X" is specifically working with this in jurisdiction "Y" and has provided feedback as such) so that it is more objective and less subjective.